Public COA audit
Retatrutide
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 93%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- RTT2613
- Issue date
- 2026-07-01
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
Pb <0.5 ppm, As <0.15 ppm, Cd <0.05 ppm, Hg <0.3 ppm
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Heavy metals panel complete
ICP-MS analysis for Pb, As, Cd, Hg with spike recovery validation. All elements below acceptance limits with proper QC controls (method blank, CCV, duplicate RPD).
Limited scope - heavy metals only
This COA only covers elemental impurities testing. No identity, purity, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or solvent/water content panels are included. This is a specialized supplemental report, not a comprehensive COA.
Professional lab presentation
Kovera Labs report with verification URL (koveralabs.com/verify), sample ID KVR-2026-6108FD, access code 0C2E0F, and lab director signature (Lemar Arghandiwal).
Analysis date within valid range
Analysis date July 01, 2026 is on or before current date 2026-07-29.
Batch information present
Lot/Batch RTT2613, Product: Retatrutide 12 mg, Lyophilized, Client: Peptide Partners.
Professional formatting and methodology
Well-structured report with clear methodology (HNO₃/H₂O₂ matrix, multi-element standard curve, internal standards Sc/Ge/In/Bi), spike recovery validation, and QC metrics.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.