Public COA audit

Retatrutide

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
88%
Panels
5/7
Purity (printed)
99.778%

Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, broad panel coverage (5/7), and 2 soft concerns.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
RTT2613
Identity method
LC-MS
Issue date
2026-07-02

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

5 of 7 present · 5 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 2 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Retatrutide

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.778%

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    As, Cd, Pb, Hg all Negative

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    PASS (≤0.5 EU/mL)

  • Sterility

    Tested · passed

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No microbial growth detected

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity achieved

    Batch average purity of 99.778% with consistent individual vial results (99.653-99.863%) meets >98% specification. This is normal for research-grade peptides.

  • Identity confirmed

    LC-MS confirmation matches expected compound (Retatrutide)

  • Batch conformity documented

    Five vials tested individually with purity and net content data provided, showing good batch consistency

  • No sample/collection date

    Certificate shows issue date (07/02/2026) but does not specify when the sample was collected or received by the lab

  • Lab identification present

    Kovera Labs identified with verification URL (koveralabs.com/verify), report number KVR-2026-6108FD, and access code GSLV7JT provided

  • Comprehensive testing suite

    Document includes purity (HPLC), identity (LC-MS), heavy metals screening (4 elements), endotoxin safety screen, and rapid sterility screening. Chromatogram included.

  • Missing panels

    No residual solvent/water content testing or traditional microbial enumeration (CFU counts) documented. Rapid sterility screening is present but not comprehensive microbial testing.

  • Professional presentation

    Well-formatted document with clear sections, vial photo, chromatogram, QR code for verification, and signature line for Lab Director

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.