Public COA audit
MOTS-c
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 93%
- Panels
- 1/7
Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (1/7), and 2 soft concerns. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- MC202603
- Sample date
- 2026-04-04
- Issue date
- 2026-04-04
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this certificate file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Purity
Not on this certificate file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
No Growth (Aerobic Bacteria, Anaerobic Bacteria, Fungi/Yeast)
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Sterility testing present
USP <71> sterility test performed using membrane filtration with 14-day incubation. Both FTM and SCDM media showed no growth. This is a sterility-scoped report only.
Limited scope report
This COA only covers sterility testing. No purity, identity, endotoxin, heavy metals, or other panels are present in this document. This appears to be a specialized sterility report, not a comprehensive COA. Other testing may exist in separate documents.
Batch number present
Lot/Batch MC202603 clearly stated
Test completion date inconsistency
Test Initiated and Test Completed both show 04/04/2026, but the document states a 14-day incubation period. The completion date should be approximately 04/18/2026. This is a logical inconsistency.
Lab identification present
Kovera Labs identified with verification URL (koveralabs.com/verify), sample ID KVR-2026-1E8D20, and access code 5E2DB0
Professional presentation
Document has professional layout, clear methodology section, proper USP <71> references, and authorized signature from Lab Director Lemar Arghandiwal
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.