Public COA audit
MOTS-c
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- MC202603
- Sample date
- 2026-04-04
- Issue date
- 2026-04-04
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
No Growth (Aerobic Bacteria, Anaerobic Bacteria, Fungi/Yeast)
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Sterility-only report
This is a sterility test report only (USP <71>). No identity, purity, heavy metals, endotoxin, or other panels are present. This is a partial COA and should be accompanied by additional analytical testing for complete characterization.
Same-day test completion
Test Initiated and Test Completed both show 04/04/2026, but the methodology specifies a 14-day incubation period. This is logically inconsistent and suggests either a data entry error or the test completion date is premature.
Professional presentation
Document has professional formatting with Kovera Labs branding, sample ID (KVR-2026-1E8D20), access code (5E2DB0), verification URL, and QR code. Lab director signature present.
Batch information present
Lot/Batch number MC202603 clearly stated with product name MOTS-c, strength 10mg, and condition (Sterile Injectable).
Detailed methodology
Comprehensive sterility test methodology documented including filter type (0.45 µm), incubation temperatures, culture media (FTM and SCDM), and acceptance criteria.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.