Public COA audit

KPV

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
88
Confidence
92%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
KV202606
Issue date
2026-06-11

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    Pb <0.5 ppm, As <0.15 ppm, Cd <0.05 ppm, Hg <0.3 ppm

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Heavy metals panel complete

    ICP-MS analysis for Pb, As, Cd, Hg with spike recovery validation. All elements pass acceptance criteria.

  • Limited scope - heavy metals only

    This report covers only elemental impurities testing. No identity, purity, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or solvent/water testing is included. This is a specialized supplemental report, not a comprehensive COA.

  • Professional presentation

    Report includes detailed methodology, spike recovery validation, QC parameters (method blank, CCV, duplicate RPD), and lab director authorization.

  • Verification system present

    Sample ID KVR-2026-DD8FF8 with access code 7E9755 and verification URL koveralabs.com/verify provided.

  • Professional formatting

    Clean layout with proper sections, tables, QR code, and consistent branding. Methodology and interpretation sections are thorough.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.