Public COA audit

TB-500 · BPC-157

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
93%
Panels
6/7
Purity (printed)
99.855%

Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, broad panel coverage (6/7), and 1 soft concern.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
KW202604
Identity method
LC-MS
Issue date
2026-04-21

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

6 of 7 present · 6 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 1 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Klow

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.855%

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    All Negative (As, Cd, Pb, Hg)

  • Microbial

    Tested · passed

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No Growth

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    PASS

  • Sterility

    Tested · passed

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No Growth

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity blend

    Batch average purity of 99.855% with consistent individual vial results (99.708-99.936%) indicates excellent quality control

  • LC-MS confirmation

    Identity confirmed via LC-MS for blend product 'Klow'

  • Comprehensive testing

    Document includes purity (HPLC), identity (LC-MS), endotoxin (LAL), microbial sterility, heavy metals screening, and component analysis

  • Batch conformity data

    Six individual vials tested with detailed purity and net content measurements showing consistency

  • Lab identification

    Kovera Labs identified with report number KVR-2026-902ECB, access code O2ANB3Z, and verification URL provided

  • Professional presentation

    Well-formatted document with chromatogram, product photo, QR code, and signature line for Lab Director

  • No residual solvent/water analysis

    Document does not include residual solvent or water content testing, which is common but not universal for peptide COAs

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.