Public COA audit
BPC-157 · TB-500
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 93%
- Panels
- 4/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.886%
Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (4/7), and 1 soft concern. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- GW202603
- Identity method
- LC-MS
- Issue date
- 2026-03-25
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
4 of 7 present · 4 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 3 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
Glow
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.886%
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
Complies
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
< 0.06 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity achieved
Blend average purity of 99.886% with consistent individual vial results (99.791-99.956%) meets >98% specification
Identity confirmed
LC-MS identification confirms product as 'Glow' blend
Batch conformity documented
Four vials tested individually with detailed purity and net content measurements
Analysis date provided
Analyzed 03/25/2026, within acceptable timeframe
Lab identification present
Kovera Labs with verification URL and access code S13ULFH provided
Core testing panels present
Purity (HPLC), identity (LC-MS), endotoxin (LAL), and heavy metals (ICP-MS) testing completed
Microbial and sterility testing not included
No microbial contamination or sterility testing documented in this report
Professional presentation
Well-formatted report with chromatogram, component analysis, and product photo included
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.