Public COA audit

DSIP

Audited July 29, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
62
Confidence
88%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
DS202605
Issue date
2026-04-24

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    Pb <0.4 ppm, As <0.25 ppm, Cd <0.07 ppm, Hg <0.5 ppm

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • No purity analysis

    This document contains only heavy metals testing. No HPLC, MS, or other purity/identity analysis is present. A complete COA for a research peptide should include purity determination.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, NMR, or other identity confirmation method is documented. Cannot verify the compound is actually DSIP.

  • Single-panel report

    Only heavy metals analysis is provided. Missing: purity, identity, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, and residual solvent/water testing.

  • Professional presentation

    Document has professional formatting, clear methodology, spike recovery validation, QC metrics, and lab director signature.

  • Verification URL provided but not validated

    Document lists koveralabs.com/verify with access code 1F7F38 and sample ID KVR-2026-02D521. Independent verification recommended.

  • Batch number present

    Lot/Batch DS202605 is documented.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.