Public COA audit
CJC-1295 (No DAC)/Ipamorelin
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 2/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CJIP202605
- Sample date
- 2026-05-14
- Issue date
- 2026-05-14
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Tested · passed
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No Growth (Bacteria), Not Detected (Fungi/Yeast)
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
No microbial growth detected
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Limited scope - sterility only
This is a rapid sterility screening report only. No identity confirmation (HPLC/MS), purity analysis, heavy metals, endotoxin, or residual solvent testing is included. This is a partial COA, not a comprehensive analysis.
Rapid screening vs. full USP sterility
Document explicitly states this is a rapid 2-day screening method suitable for QC purposes, and notes that full USP <71> sterility testing may be required for regulatory compliance. This is a preliminary assessment, not a full sterility validation.
Batch number present
Lot number CJIP202605 clearly documented
Same-day turnaround
Sample received and certified on same date (05/14/2026), consistent with rapid screening methodology
Lab verification not possible
Kovera Labs is named but no website URL, contact information, or accreditation details are provided. QR code present but cannot be verified from static image. Independent verification of lab credentials not possible from this document alone.
Professional presentation
Document has clean, professional layout with clear sections, branded header, and structured data presentation consistent with legitimate testing reports
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.