Public COA audit
CJC-1295 no DAC
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 5/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.654%
Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, broad panel coverage (5/7), and 2 soft concerns.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CJ202606
- Identity method
- LC-MS
- Issue date
- 2026-06-09
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
5 of 7 present · 5 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 2 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
CJC-1295 no DAC
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.654%
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
As, Cd, Pb, Hg all Negative
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
PASS (≤0.5 EU/mL)
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
No Growth
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity achieved
Batch average purity of 99.654% with consistent individual vial results (99.326-99.776%) meets >98% specification
Identity confirmed
LC-MS confirmation matches expected compound CJC-1295 no DAC
Batch conformity documented
Five vials tested individually with purity and net content data provided
Issue date valid
Certificate issued 2026-06-09, which is before current date 2026-09-05
Lab identification present
Kovera Labs identified with verification URL and access code JUOXFTS provided
Comprehensive testing suite
Identity, purity, heavy metals, endotoxin, sterility, and fentanyl screening all performed and passed
Missing standard microbial panel
No traditional microbial contamination testing (TAMC/TYMC) documented, though rapid sterility screening was performed
No residual solvent/water content
No Karl Fischer water content or residual solvent analysis documented
Professional presentation
Well-formatted report with chromatogram, batch data table, and product photo included
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.