Public COA audit
BPC-157/TB-500
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 2/7
Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), 2 soft concerns, and notable note: "Sterility-only report". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum and prefer labs with a public verification portal.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- BB202605
- Sample date
- 2026-04-21
- Issue date
- 2026-04-21
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this certificate file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Purity
Not on this certificate file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Tested · passed
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No Growth (Bacteria), Not Detected (Fungi/Yeast)
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
No microbial growth detected
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Sterility-only report
This is a sterility screening report only. No identity, purity, endotoxin, heavy metals, or residual solvent testing is included in this document. This may be part of a multi-document COA package.
Lab verification needed
Kovera Labs is not a widely recognized third-party testing laboratory in the peptide industry. No verification URL or independent contact information provided. QR code present but destination unknown.
Rapid screening method disclosed
Document clearly states this is a rapid screening method suitable for quality control, and notes that full USP <71> sterility testing may be required for regulatory compliance. Transparency is appropriate.
Lot number present
Batch/lot number BB202605 clearly stated and matches vial image.
Same-day turnaround
Sample received and certified on same day (04/21/2026). While rapid for sterility testing, the document explicitly describes this as a rapid screening method with 14-day incubation, which is internally consistent.
Professional presentation
Document has professional layout, clear sections, appropriate disclaimers, and includes sample photograph with matching lot number.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.