Public COA audit

Bacteriostatic Water

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
93%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
BAC202603
Issue date
2026-06-09

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    < 0.20 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Professional lab presentation

    Kovera Labs report with proper formatting, QR code, verification URL, and lab director signature

  • Endotoxin testing performed

    Comprehensive bacterial endotoxin analysis using USP <85> kinetic chromogenic LAL assay with positive and negative controls

  • Analysis date within valid range

    Analysis date 06/09/2026 is on or before current date 2026-07-29

  • Batch information present

    Lot/Batch BAC202603 clearly documented with sample ID KVR-2026-383C6D and access code 68B11F

  • Limited scope - single panel only

    This COA only covers endotoxin testing for bacteriostatic water. No identity, purity, heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent testing included. This is appropriate for this product type but limits comprehensive assessment.

  • No identity confirmation

    Product is bacteriostatic water (not a peptide), so identity testing may not be applicable, but no compositional analysis provided

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.