Public COA audit
AOD-9604
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 2/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- AO202605
- Sample date
- 2026-04-20
- Issue date
- 2026-04-20
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Tested · passed
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
Bacteria: No Growth; Fungi/Yeast: Not Detected
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
No microbial growth detected
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Sterility-only report
This is a single-panel sterility screening report. No identity confirmation (MS, NMR, HPLC), purity analysis, heavy metals, endotoxin, or residual solvent testing is included. This is common for supplemental testing but incomplete as a standalone COA for peptide quality verification.
Kovera Labs - unverified
Kovera Labs is not a widely recognized third-party peptide testing laboratory in public databases. No verification URL or contact information is provided to independently confirm the lab's accreditation or this report's authenticity.
Same-day turnaround
Sample received and certified on the same date (04/20/2026) despite claiming a 14-day incubation period for USP <71> sterility testing. This timeline is physically impossible for the stated methodology.
Rapid screening disclaimer
Document explicitly states this is a 'rapid screening method' for 'preliminary sterility assessment' and notes that 'full USP <71> sterility testing may be required' for regulatory compliance, yet claims to use USP <71> methodology. This creates ambiguity about whether full pharmacopeial standards were followed.
Lot number present
Batch/lot number AO202605 is clearly stated and matches the vial image shown.
Clear sterility results
Sterility screening results are clearly presented with pass/fail status for bacteria and fungi/yeast, with appropriate methodology details.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.