Public COA audit
BPC-157 · GHK-Cu
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 93%
- Panels
- 4/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.9%
Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (4/7), and 1 soft concern. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- uvt8mqe
- Identity method
- HPLC-UV-MS with Mass Spectral Match
- Sample date
- 2026-04-21
- Issue date
- 2026-05-13
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
4 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 2 reported · 3 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID Confirmed for all four peptides
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
>99.9%
Heavy metals
Tested · result on file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · result on file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High chromatographic purity
Chromatographic purity >99.9% is excellent and typical for high-quality research peptides. HPLC chromatogram on page 2 shows clean baseline with minimal impurity peaks.
Mass spectral confirmation for all compounds
All four peptides (BPC-157, GHK-Cu, KPV, Thymosin β4) confirmed by mass spectrometry with CAS numbers provided. Mass spectrum shown on page 3.
Batch/lot number present
Lot uvt8mqe clearly stated with Lab # 204653 and Project 145199.
Dates are consistent and valid
Sample received 2026-04-21, testing performed 2026-05-01, report issued 2026-05-13. All dates are sequential and on or before today (2026-09-05).
Testing lab identified
Krause Analytical LLC, 8127 Mesa Drive Suite B-206, Austin, TX 78759. Signed by Mark C. Krause, Laboratory Director. Verification URL provided: https://finnrick.com/verify
Endotoxin and heavy metals testing documented
Methods summary on page 4 describes endotoxin testing (LAL method per USP/NF 86) and metals testing (ICP-MS per USP/NF 233). Specific numeric results not shown on this COA but methods are documented.
Endotoxin and metals results not numerically reported
While methods for endotoxin (LAL) and heavy metals (ICP-MS) are described on page 4, no numeric results or pass/fail statements appear on page 1. This may indicate results are in a separate report or were not performed for this specific test.
Professional formatting with supporting data
Document includes HPLC chromatogram (page 2), mass spectrum (page 3), and detailed methods summary (page 4). Consistent branding between Finnrick and Krause Analytical. Watermarks present throughout.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.