Public COA audit
BPC-157 · GHK-Cu
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 93%
- Panels
- 4/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.9%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- uvt8mqe
- Identity method
- HPLC-UV-MS with Mass Spectral Match
- Sample date
- 2026-04-21
- Issue date
- 2026-05-13
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
4 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 2 reported · 3 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID Confirmed for all four peptides
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
>99.9%
Heavy metals
Tested · result on file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · result on file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High chromatographic purity
Chromatographic purity >99.9% is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides. Supported by clean chromatogram showing minimal impurity peaks.
All peptides confirmed by mass spectrometry
Mass spectral match confirmed for all four peptides (BPC-157, GHK-Cu, KPV, Thymosin β4) with CAS numbers provided. Mass spectrum data included on page 3.
Batch/lot number present
Batch/Lot uvt8mqe clearly stated and matches Test Certificate ID
Dates are consistent and valid
Sample received 2026-04-21, testing performed 2026-05-01, report issued 2026-05-13. All dates are sequential and reasonable (22-day turnaround).
Established testing laboratory
Krause Analytical LLC is a known third-party testing lab in Austin, TX. Verification URL provided (https://finnrick.com/verify). Signed by Mark C. Krause, Laboratory Director.
Multiple testing panels performed
Identity, purity, endotoxin, and heavy metals testing methods documented. Detailed methods summary provided on page 4 referencing USP/NF standards.
Endotoxin and metals results not shown
Methods summary indicates endotoxin (LAL) and heavy metals (ICP-MS) testing were performed, but numerical results are not displayed on the COA. Only purity and identity results are shown.
Professional presentation
Multi-page report with chromatogram (page 2), mass spectrum (page 3), and detailed methods (page 4). Includes vial photos, watermarks, and standard laboratory formatting.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.