Public COA audit

BPC-157 · GHK-Cu

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
88%
Panels
3/7
Purity (printed)
99.5%

Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (3/7), 3 soft concerns, and notable note: "High chromatographic purity". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
q2wwe2u
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS with Mass Spectral Match
Sample date
2026-03-03
Issue date
2026-03-31

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

3 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 4 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed (all four peptides)

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.5%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · result on file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    0.71 EU

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High chromatographic purity

    99.5% purity is excellent and normal for research-grade peptides

  • All peptides confirmed by mass spec

    BPC-157, GHK-Cu, KPV, and Thymosin β4 all show 'ID Confirmed' with CAS numbers and mass spectra

  • Branding inconsistency

    Document header shows 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Finnrick.com' but footer and signature reference 'Krause Analytical LLC' with Austin, TX address. This dual-branding pattern (vendor + testing lab) is common but can be confusing.

  • Batch/lot number present

    Lot q2wwe2u clearly stated

  • Dates are consistent and valid

    Sample received 3/3/2026, testing completed 3/20-3/31/2026, all dates are on or before today (2026-09-05)

  • Endotoxin testing performed

    0.71 EU result shown using USP 86 LAL method on 3/20/2026

  • Heavy metals method described but no results

    Page 4 describes ICP-MS method (USP/NF 233) for metals testing, but no results are shown in the COA table. This may indicate metals testing was not performed for this lot.

  • No microbial, sterility, or residual solvent testing

    Only purity, identity, and endotoxin panels are present. Missing panels are common for research-grade peptides but limit the comprehensiveness of this COA.

  • Professional presentation with chromatograms and mass spectra

    Pages 2-3 show detailed HPLC chromatogram and mass spectra for all four peptides, supporting the identity and purity claims

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.