Public COA audit
KLOW · GHK-Cu
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.5%
Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), 3 soft concerns, and notable note: "High purity achieved". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum and prefer labs with a public verification portal.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- PPA-WL-KLOW-P000630
- Identity method
- R-HPLC
- Sample date
- 2026-07-13
- Issue date
- 2026-07-27
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
Retention Time 0.5-1 min
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.5%
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity achieved
99.5% purity by R-HPLC is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides
Identity confirmed
R-HPLC retention time match to analytical standard (0.5-1 min)
Batch number present
PPA-WL-KLOW-P000630
Dates present and logical
Sample received 2026-07-13, analyzed and issued 2026-07-27 (14-day turnaround)
Lab verification not possible
Pacific Coast Biologics Inc is named but no website, contact info, or accreditation details provided for independent verification
Limited testing scope
This appears to be a purity/identity-focused report. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing shown on this document. Multi-peptide blend products often have separate safety testing reports
Multi-peptide blend quantification
Product contains 4 peptides (GHK-Cu 55.1mg, KPV 10.9mg, BPC-157 11.1mg, TB500 22.5mg). TB500 result (22.5mg vs 10mg spec) shows 125% overfill, which is unusual but not impossible for blend formulations
Professional presentation
Document includes logo, disclaimer, signature, chromatogram, and standard COA structure
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.