Public COA audit
Ipamorelin
Audited September 5, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.58%
Scored poorly because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (2/7), 1 critical finding, and notable note: "No lot/batch number". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Identity method
- HPLC (Acquity H-class Plus Xevo G2-XS QTOF)
- Issue date
- 2023-08-25
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 2 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · result on file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
HPLC chromatogram shown
Purity
Tested · result on file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.58%
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No lot/batch number
Lot number field shows 'N/A' which is highly unusual for a legitimate COA. Batch traceability is fundamental to quality control.
Missing sample date
Only analysis date (2023.08.25) is provided. No sample receipt date or issue date distinct from analysis date.
High purity with detailed chromatogram
99.58% purity is excellent and supported by detailed HPLC chromatogram showing main peak at 13.54 min with area 67438828 (99.58%) and minor impurities properly listed.
HPLC-MS instrument specified
Uses Acquity H-class Plus Xevo G2-XS QTOF, a legitimate Waters instrument capable of both HPLC and mass spec analysis.
Limited testing scope
This report only covers purity/identity testing. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing included. This may be a purity-only report with other panels tested separately.
Limited lab information
Weipu lab logo and Shanghai addresses provided, but no analyst signature, QA approval, or direct verification contact. Website shown: www.weipugroup.com
Minimal COA format
Document titled 'Report of Testing' rather than 'Certificate of Analysis'. Very basic format lacking standard COA elements like specifications, pass/fail criteria, signatures, or QA stamps.
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (1107 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.