Public COA audit

CJC-1295

Audited September 5, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
45
Confidence
82%
Panels
2/7

Scored poorly because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (2/7), 2 critical findings, and notable note: "No purity testing". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
L1162
Issue date
2025-07-07

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Purity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    As: 0.008 ppm, Cd: <0.001 ppm, Hg: <0.001 ppm, Pb: 0.014 ppm

  • Microbial

    Tested · passed

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    Total Aerobic Count: <100 cfu/g, Total Coliforms: <10 cfu/g, E. coli: Absent, Salmonella: Absent, Staphylococcus: Absent, Total Yeast & Molds: <100 cfu/g

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • No purity testing

    This COA lacks any HPLC or purity analysis, which is essential for peptide quality verification. Only heavy metals and microbial testing are present.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity verification method is documented. Cannot confirm the product is actually CJC-1295.

  • Missing critical peptide panels

    Endotoxin testing is absent, which is important for injectable research peptides. No residual solvent/water content analysis.

  • Unusual COA scope

    This appears to be a finished product quality control document focused on appearance, flavor, and contamination testing rather than a typical peptide COA. The organoleptic testing (appearance: 'Green in color', flavor: 'Characteristic of Citrus') is highly unusual for a peptide product.

  • Limited lab information

    InstaMed lab name is present but no address, accreditation information, or verification URL provided. Cannot independently verify lab credentials.

  • Lot number present

    Lot number L1162 is clearly documented.

Timing & next steps

Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.

  • coa age

    This COA was issued over a year ago (425 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.