Public COA audit
HMG · Sample 3 HMG ED2025
Audited July 29, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 2605-ED-HM
- Sample date
- 2026-06-18
- Issue date
- 2026-06-24
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · result on file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
82.15 mcg
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No purity testing performed
This report only contains HMG (heavy metals) quantification at 82.15 mcg. No HPLC purity, identity confirmation, or other standard peptide quality panels are present.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, HPLC retention time, or other identity verification method is documented. Cannot confirm the compound is actually HMG or the intended peptide.
Single-panel report
Only heavy metals testing was performed. Standard peptide COAs typically include purity, identity, and often microbial/endotoxin panels. This is a very limited scope test report.
Known testing laboratory
Janoshik is a recognized third-party analytical laboratory in the peptide/research compound space with verification URL provided.
Batch number present
Batch 2605-ED-HM is clearly documented.
Dates are consistent and recent
Testing ordered 2026-06-16, sample received 2026-06-18, analysis conducted 2026-06-24. Timeline is logical and all dates are on or before 2026-07-29.
Minimal documentation
Report lacks detailed methodology, acceptance criteria, analyst information, and comprehensive quality data typically expected in a full COA.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.