Public COA audit

HMG · Sample 3 HMG ED2025

Audited July 29, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
45
Confidence
75%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
2605-ED-HM
Sample date
2026-06-18
Issue date
2026-06-24

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · result on file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    82.15 mcg

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • No purity testing performed

    This report only contains HMG (heavy metals) quantification at 82.15 mcg. No HPLC purity, identity confirmation, or other standard peptide quality panels are present.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, HPLC retention time, or other identity verification method is documented. Cannot confirm the compound is actually HMG or the intended peptide.

  • Single-panel report

    Only heavy metals testing was performed. Standard peptide COAs typically include purity, identity, and often microbial/endotoxin panels. This is a very limited scope test report.

  • Known testing laboratory

    Janoshik is a recognized third-party analytical laboratory in the peptide/research compound space with verification URL provided.

  • Batch number present

    Batch 2605-ED-HM is clearly documented.

  • Dates are consistent and recent

    Testing ordered 2026-06-16, sample received 2026-06-18, analysis conducted 2026-06-24. Timeline is logical and all dates are on or before 2026-07-29.

  • Minimal documentation

    Report lacks detailed methodology, acceptance criteria, analyst information, and comprehensive quality data typically expected in a full COA.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.