Public COA audit

hCG

Audited September 5, 2026

Evidence suggests fabrication

Multiple signals on this document conflict with known lab formats or verification patterns.

Legitimacy
15
Confidence
92%
Panels
3/7

Scored poorly because audit signals point to fabrication or reused paperwork, limited panel coverage (3/7), 3 critical findings, and notable note: "Mass Spectral ID Failed". To improve: replace this file with an original lab certificate that verifies on the lab portal and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
n27jfhc
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2026-05-28
Issue date
2026-06-12

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

3 of 7 present · 1 passed · 1 failed · 1 reported · 4 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · failed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Incorrect

  • Purity

    Tested · result on file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    ND

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    <0.5 EU

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Mass Spectral ID Failed

    The certificate explicitly states 'Mass Spectral ID: Incorrect' - the compound failed identity verification by mass spectrometry. This is a critical failure indicating the sample is not the claimed compound (hCG).

  • Chromatographic Purity Not Detected

    Purity result shows 'ND' (Not Detected) with no percentage value. Combined with failed identity test, this suggests the sample does not contain the target peptide or contains insufficient material for quantification.

  • Conflicting Lab Branding

    Document shows dual branding: 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Finnrick.com' in headers/footers, but the body text, signature, and methods reference 'Krause Analytical LLC' (8127 Mesa Drive Suite B-206 Austin, TX 78759). The signature is from 'Mark C. Krause, Laboratory Director' of Krause Analytical. This inconsistent branding is highly suspicious - legitimate labs do not mix company identities on official COAs.

  • Watermark Overlay

    Heavy 'FINNRICK' watermark overlays throughout the document obscure some content. While watermarks are used by some vendors, this implementation is unusually intrusive for a professional analytical certificate.

  • Failed Product Release

    This COA documents a failed analysis (incorrect identity, no detectable purity). Legitimate labs issue such reports, but releasing a product with this COA would be inappropriate. If this is being presented as proof of product quality, that is a red flag.

  • Verification URL Domain Mismatch

    Verification URL is 'https://finnrick.com/verify' but the performing laboratory is stated as Krause Analytical LLC. The domain should match the actual testing laboratory, not a reseller/vendor brand.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.