Public COA audit
HCG · Human Chorionic Gonadotropin
Audited July 29, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 0/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- Test-ED1
- Sample date
- 2026-06-05
- Issue date
- 2026-06-18
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
0 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 7 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Only quantitative assay performed
This report only provides an HCG quantification (7148 IU) without any identity confirmation, purity analysis, or safety testing panels. This is a potency test, not a comprehensive Certificate of Analysis.
No identity confirmation
No analytical method (HPLC, MS, etc.) is documented to confirm the substance is actually HCG. Only a quantitative result is provided.
No purity data
No purity percentage or impurity profile is provided. Cannot assess product quality beyond potency.
Batch number present
Batch Test-ED1 from manufacturer Swiss Chems is documented.
Dates are reasonable
Testing ordered 14 May 2026, sample received 5 June 2026, analysis conducted 18 June 2026. Timeline is logical and all dates are on or before 2026-07-29.
Known testing laboratory
Janoshik is a recognized third-party testing laboratory for research compounds. Verification URL and unique key (CVY1ULPW9GJV) are provided.
Minimal documentation
Report format is very basic with limited technical detail. No methodology, equipment, or analyst information provided.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.