Public COA audit
Glutathione
Audited September 5, 2026
Multiple signals on this document conflict with known lab formats or verification patterns.
- Legitimacy
- 15
- Confidence
- 92%
- Panels
- 4/7
Scored poorly because audit signals point to fabrication or reused paperwork, limited panel coverage (4/7), 4 critical findings, and notable note: "Mass Spectral Match Failed". To improve: replace this file with an original lab certificate that verifies on the lab portal and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- whm9fzc
- Identity method
- HPLC-UV-MS
- Sample date
- 2026-06-04
- Issue date
- 2026-06-15
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
4 of 7 present · 0 passed · 1 failed · 3 reported · 3 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · failed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
Incorrect
Purity
Tested · result on file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
ND
Heavy metals
Tested · result on file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · result on file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Mass Spectral Match Failed
The COA explicitly states 'Mass Spectral Match: Incorrect' — the compound failed identity verification by mass spectrometry. This is a fundamental failure indicating the sample is not the claimed compound (Glutathione).
Purity Not Detected
Chromatographic purity shows 'ND' (Not Detected) with no percentage value. Combined with identity failure, this suggests the sample does not contain the target compound at detectable levels.
Glutathione Quantity Not Detected
The Glutathione quantification row shows 'ND mg' — no measurable amount of the target compound was found in the sample.
Vendor/Lab Name Mismatch
The document header shows 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Finnrick.com' but the lab performing analysis is 'Krause Analytical LLC' (Austin, TX). The branding is inconsistent — Finnrick appears to be a reseller/vendor, not the testing lab, yet the document is styled as a Finnrick certificate.
Unusual Result Presentation
A legitimate COA would not typically issue a certificate for a sample that completely failed identity and purity testing. The document format suggests this may be a template or fabricated report rather than a genuine analytical result.
Methods Listed But No Results
Page 4 describes methods for Endotoxins (USP/NF 86) and Metals (USP/NF 233), but page 1 shows no actual test results for these panels. This suggests incomplete testing or a template document.
Batch/Lot Number Present
Batch/Lot number 'whm9fzc' is clearly stated and matches across pages.
Dates Within Valid Range
Sample received 2026-06-04, tested 2026-06-09, report issued 2026-06-15. All dates are sequential and on or before the current date (2026-09-05).
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.