Public COA audit
GHK-Cu · BPC-157
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 83%
- Panels
- 3/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.84%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 0007
- Identity method
- HPLC with UV Detection Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (LCMS/MS)
- Sample date
- 2025-11-19
- Issue date
- 2025-11-21
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
3 of 7 present · 3 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 4 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
GHK-Cu/BPC-157/Thymosin Beta-4 confirmed by mass spectrometry
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.84%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
≤ 0.05 EU/mL (both replicates)
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
99.84% purity by HPLC-MS is within normal range for research-grade peptides
Mass spectrometry confirmation
Chromatogram and mass spectrum provided showing expected molecular ions for all three peptides
Batch number present
Lot 0007 clearly stated
Limited lab verification
Freedom Diagnostics website and contact provided, but independent verification of lab accreditation/credentials not possible from document alone
Limited testing scope
Only purity, identity, and endotoxin panels present. Missing heavy metals, microbial, sterility, and residual solvent testing. This is common for basic peptide COAs but limits comprehensive quality assurance.
Two separate accession numbers
Page 1 shows accession 2511190039 (purity/identity), Page 2 shows 2511190040 (endotoxin). Same lot 0007, same dates. Appears to be split testing rather than duplicate COAs, but unusual presentation.
Professional presentation
Document includes chromatograms, mass spectra, product photo, signatory, and standard disclaimers consistent with legitimate testing lab format
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.