Public COA audit

GHK-Cu/BPC-157/TB-500 · GHK-Cu

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
88
Confidence
92%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.64%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
GLOW09082025-J
Identity method
HPLC with UV Detection Coupled with Mass Spectrometry
Sample date
2025-09-10
Issue date
2025-09-13

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    GHK-Cu/BPC-157/Thymosin Beta-4 confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.64%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    99.64% purity by HPLC is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides

  • Identity confirmed by mass spectrometry

    Mass spec data shows expected molecular ion peaks for all three peptide components with proper labeling

  • Batch/lot number present

    Lot GLOW09082025-J clearly documented

  • Dates properly documented

    Received 2025-09-10, reported 2025-09-13 - reasonable 3-day turnaround

  • Lab identification present

    Freedom Diagnostics, USA-based, with contact information and website provided

  • Limited testing scope

    Only identity and purity panels performed. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing documented

  • Professional presentation

    Well-formatted COA with chromatogram, mass spectrum, product photos, and clear data presentation

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.