Public COA audit

GHK-Cu

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
93%
Panels
3/7
Purity (printed)
99.9%

Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (3/7), and 2 soft concerns. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
bnkauur
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2026-01-16
Issue date
2026-02-04

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

3 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 4 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    >99.9%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · result on file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    0.98 EU/vial

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High chromatographic purity

    HPLC purity >99.9% is excellent and normal for research-grade peptides.

  • Identity confirmed by MS

    Mass spectrum matches reference standard for GHK-Cu (m/z 342 base peak consistent with expected molecular ion).

  • Batch/lot number present

    Lot bnkauur clearly stated on certificate.

  • Dates are consistent and valid

    Sample received 2026-01-16, testing performed 2026-01-26 to 2026-01-31, report issued 2026-02-04. All dates are logical and on or before 2026-09-05.

  • Reputable testing laboratory

    Krause Analytical LLC is a known third-party analytical lab in Austin, TX. Signed by Mark C. Krause, Laboratory Director.

  • Verification URL provided

    Certificate includes verification URL https://finnrick.com/verify with certificate ID bnkauur.

  • Endotoxin testing performed

    Endotoxin result 0.98 EU/vial by USP 86 (LAL method). No explicit pass/fail limit stated, but value is low.

  • Heavy metals method described but no results

    Page 3 describes ICP-MS method for metals (USP/NF 233), but no heavy metals results are reported on page 1. This may indicate metals testing was not performed for this lot, or results are in a separate report.

  • Microbial and sterility testing not performed

    No microbial contamination or sterility testing results are present. This is common for non-sterile research peptides but limits the scope of quality assurance.

  • Professional formatting and documentation

    Certificate includes chromatogram, mass spectrum comparison, detailed methods summary, and proper lab branding. Formatting is consistent with legitimate analytical reports.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.