Public COA audit

GHK-Cu

Audited September 5, 2026

Evidence suggests fabrication

Multiple signals on this document conflict with known lab formats or verification patterns.

Legitimacy
15
Confidence
92%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.816%

Scored poorly because audit signals point to fabrication or reused paperwork, limited panel coverage (2/7), 3 critical findings, and notable note: "Non-existent testing laboratory". To improve: replace this file with an original lab certificate that verifies on the lab portal and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
665394
Identity method
HPLC with UV Detection Coupled with Mass Spectrometry
Sample date
2026-04-06
Issue date
2026-04-07

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    GHK-Cu confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.816%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Non-existent testing laboratory

    Freedom Diagnostics and FreedomDiagnosticsTesting.com do not correspond to any known accredited peptide testing laboratory. No verifiable business registration, accreditation records, or independent references found for this entity.

  • Unprofessional document quality

    Document exhibits multiple formatting irregularities: inconsistent spacing, amateur layout, generic stock photo of vials with visible 'GHK-Cu' label (unusual for analytical lab documentation), and overall presentation inconsistent with established testing laboratories.

  • Suspicious contact information

    Contact email '[email protected]' uses generic admin address rather than professional laboratory contact structure. Domain registration and web presence cannot be independently verified as legitimate analytical laboratory.

  • Minimal mass spectrometry data

    Mass spectrum shows only two peaks ([M+2H]2+ at 171.10 and [M+H]+ at 341.05) without comprehensive fragmentation pattern, isotope distribution, or detailed spectral analysis typical of rigorous identity confirmation.

  • Limited testing scope

    COA only includes purity and identity testing. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water analysis. While not automatically disqualifying, this is minimal for research-grade peptides.

  • Generic disclaimer language

    Disclaimer text appears boilerplate and generic, lacking specific laboratory accreditations, certifications, or regulatory compliance statements typical of established testing facilities.

  • Lot number present

    Lot number 665394 is clearly stated.

  • Dates within acceptable range

    Received date 2026-04-06 and reported date 2026-04-07 are both before today (2026-09-05) and show reasonable 1-day turnaround.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.