Public COA audit

GHK-Cu

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
62
Confidence
75%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.816%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
665394
Identity method
HPLC with UV Detection Coupled with Mass Spectrometry
Sample date
2026-04-06
Issue date
2026-04-07

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    GHK-Cu confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.816%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    HPLC purity of 99.816% with clear chromatogram showing single major peak

  • Mass spec confirmation

    Mass spectrum shows expected [M+2H]2+ at 171.10 and [M+H]+ at 341.05, consistent with GHK-Cu

  • Lab verification uncertain

    Freedom Diagnostics Testing website and contact information provided, but independent verification of lab accreditation not performed

  • Basic presentation

    COA has minimal formatting and lacks detailed methodology, QC parameters, or analyst credentials beyond name

  • Limited testing scope

    Only identity and purity panels present; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or solvent/water content testing

  • Lot number present

    Lot 665394 clearly documented

  • Dates documented

    Received 2026-04-06, reported 2026-04-07 (one-day turnaround)

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.