Public COA audit

GHK-Cu

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
93%
Panels
6/7
Purity (printed)
99.766%

Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, broad panel coverage (6/7), and 2 soft concerns.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
AMC-GHK-100-02
Identity method
LC-MS
Issue date
2026-07-15

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

6 of 7 present · 6 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 1 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    GHK-Cu

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.766%

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    All Negative (As, Cd, Pb, Hg)

  • Microbial

    Tested · passed

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No Growth

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    Pass (≤0.5 EU/mL)

  • Sterility

    Tested · passed

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No Growth

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    99.766% average purity with individual vial measurements of 99.711% and 99.821%, consistent with research-grade peptide standards

  • Identity confirmed by LC-MS

    GHK-Cu identity verified using LC-MS method, molecular formula C14H24N6O4Cu provided

  • Comprehensive testing panel

    Document includes purity (HPLC), identity (LC-MS), endotoxin safety, fentanyl screening, microbial sterility, heavy metals (As, Cd, Pb, Hg), and pH testing

  • Batch conformity data

    Individual vial testing results provided (Vial 1 and Vial 2) with batch averages calculated

  • Lab verification not independently confirmed

    Kovera Labs is named as testing facility with QR code and access code (F4VZ1GW) provided, but no URL or independent verification method visible on this document

  • Professional presentation

    Document has professional layout with clear sections, chromatogram included, product photo, and signature from Lab Director

  • Residual solvent/water content not tested

    No explicit residual solvent or water content analysis visible in this report

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.