Public COA audit

GHK-CU

Audited September 5, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
62
Confidence
82%
Panels
1/7

Scored lower because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (1/7), 3 soft concerns, and notable note: "Endotoxin-only report". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
PPA-RL-CU100-R00227
Sample date
2026-07-10
Issue date
2026-07-15

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Purity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    0.0129 EU/µg

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Endotoxin-only report

    This COA is scoped to endotoxin testing only. No purity (HPLC), identity (MS), heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent/water panels are present. This appears to be a specialized endotoxin-focused report, possibly part of a split testing arrangement where other panels may exist in separate documents.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, NMR, or other identity verification method is documented in this report.

  • No purity data

    No HPLC or other purity analysis is included. Purity percentage cannot be determined from this document.

  • Endotoxin testing present

    Bacterial endotoxin testing performed via LAL method with detailed ENDOSAFE instrument data. Result 0.0129 EU/µg meets specification ≤ 0.1 EU/µg.

  • Batch number present

    Lot number PPA-RL-CU100-R00227 clearly documented with manufacturer Peptaura-Retalux.

  • Dates present and valid

    Sample received 2026-07-10, analysis and issue date 2026-07-15. All dates are on or before 2026-09-05 (today) and show reasonable turnaround time.

  • Testing lab identified

    Pacific Coast Biologics Inc identified as testing laboratory with signatory Ramon Rochin, Senior Chemist.

  • Professional presentation

    Document has professional layout with clear branding, structured data tables, detailed ENDOSAFE instrument output, and appropriate disclaimers.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.