Public COA audit

GHK-Cu

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
83%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.9%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
8xvxg79
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2026-02-06
Issue date
2026-02-22

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    >99.9%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    Chromatographic purity >99.9% by HPLC-UV/MS with supporting chromatogram showing single dominant peak at 0.47 min

  • Identity confirmed

    Mass spectrum matches reference standard for GHK-Cu (CAS 49557-75-7); mass spectrum data provided on page 2

  • Batch/lot documented

    Batch/Lot 8xvxg79 clearly stated; Lab # 200910; Project 145052

  • Dates within normal range

    Sample received 2/6/2026, method date 2/17/2026, report issued 2/22/2026 - all dates are sequential and reasonable

  • Dual branding inconsistency

    Document shows both 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Krause Analytical LLC' branding throughout. Header says 'Finnrick.com' and 'Finnrick Analytics Lab # 200910', but footer and signature reference 'Krause Analytical LLC' and director Mark C. Krause. This dual branding is unusual and may indicate a reseller/white-label arrangement, but is not explained on the COA.

  • Verification URL domain mismatch

    Verification URL is https://finnrick.com/verify but the actual testing lab appears to be Krause Analytical LLC. The relationship between Finnrick and Krause Analytical is not clarified on the document.

  • Methods described but results not shown

    Page 3 describes methods for Endotoxins (USP/NF 85) and Metals (USP/NF 233), but no actual test results for these panels appear on the COA. Only purity/potency/identity results are provided.

  • Professional presentation

    Document includes chromatogram, mass spectrum comparison, detailed methods summary, and proper USP/NF method references

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.