Public COA audit
GHK-Cu
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 3/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.79%
Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (3/7), 3 soft concerns, and notable note: "High purity confirmed". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CR-GHKC99-2511-1
- Identity method
- LCMS/MS (HPLC with UV Detection Coupled with Mass Spectrometry)
- Sample date
- 2025-12-15
- Issue date
- 2025-12-16
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
3 of 7 present · 3 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 4 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
99.79%
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
Vial 1: 99.776%, Vial 2: 99.812%, Average: 99.79%
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
Replicate 1: ≤ 0.05 EU/mL, Replicate 2: ≤ 0.05 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
HPLC purity of 99.79% (average of two vials: 99.776% and 99.812%) is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides.
Mass spec confirmation
LCMS/MS analysis shows expected molecular ions [M+2H]2+ at 171.00 and [M+H]+ at 341.00, consistent with GHK-Cu identity.
Endotoxin testing performed
Two replicates both passed with results ≤ 0.05 EU/mL, meeting typical research-grade endotoxin thresholds.
Batch information complete
Lot number CR-GHKC99-2511-1 clearly stated with net peptide content for two vials (99.39 mg and 99.91 mg).
Dates within normal range
Received 2025-12-15, reported 2025-12-16 (one-day turnaround is plausible for routine testing).
Lab verification uncertain
Freedom Diagnostics presents as a USA-based testing lab with website FreedomDiagnosticsTesting.com and email [email protected]. Independent verification of lab accreditation/credentials not possible from document alone.
Non-standard COA format
Document uses custom layout with product photos and branded vials. While not inherently problematic, this differs from typical third-party lab reports which tend to be more standardized/clinical in appearance.
Limited testing scope
COA only includes purity, identity, and endotoxin panels. Heavy metals, microbial contamination, sterility, and residual solvents/water content not tested. This is common for basic research-grade testing but limits comprehensive quality assurance.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.