Public COA audit

GHK-Cu

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
85%
Panels
3/7
Purity (printed)
99.79%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
CR-GHKC99-2511-1
Identity method
HPLC with UV Detection Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (LCMS/MS)
Sample date
2025-12-15
Issue date
2025-12-16

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

3 of 7 present · 3 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 4 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    99.79%

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    Vial 1: 99.776%, Vial 2: 99.812%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    Replicate 1 & 2: ≤ 0.05 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    HPLC purity of 99.79% with individual vial measurements of 99.776% and 99.812% is consistent with high-quality research peptide standards

  • Mass spectrometry confirmation

    Mass spec data shows expected [M+2H]2+ at 171.00 and [M+H]+ at 341.00, consistent with GHK-Cu molecular weight

  • Limited testing scope

    Only identity, purity, and endotoxin panels present. Missing heavy metals, microbial, sterility, and residual solvent/water testing

  • Lab verification unclear

    Freedom Diagnostics website and contact provided, but independent verification of lab accreditation/credentials not possible from document alone

  • Professional presentation with minor inconsistencies

    Document appears professionally formatted with chromatogram and mass spec data, though some layout elements (repeated 'TEST' fields at top) suggest template usage

  • Dates within normal range

    Received 12/15/2025, reported 12/16/2025 - one-day turnaround is reasonable for basic testing

  • Batch information complete

    Lot number CR-GHKC99-2511-1 provided with client name (Crush Research) and search code for verification

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.