Public COA audit
SS-31
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 88
- Confidence
- 87%
- Panels
- 1/7
Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (1/7), and 2 soft concerns. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- SY20250806
- Sample date
- 2025-09-19
- Issue date
- 2025-09-19
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this certificate file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Purity
Not on this certificate file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
< 0.20 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Endotoxin-specific report
This is a dedicated endotoxin testing report for SS-31 lot SY20250806. It does not include purity, identity, or other panels — those may exist in separate documents for this lot.
Professional lab presentation
BioRegen branding, report ID (PP-ENDO-250919-135), validation key (PEPPART901), contact info, and QR code for verification are present.
Clear lot identification
Lot number SY20250806 clearly stated for SS-31 peptide, 10mg concentration, 2 vials received.
Test date documented
Test performed on 09/19/2025, analyst signature dated 09/19/2025. Both dates are valid and consistent.
Endotoxin test passed
Chromogenic LAL assay result < 0.20 EU/mL, below the 0.1 EU/mL threshold stated. Positive and negative controls both passed as expected.
Minor interpretation inconsistency
Interpretation states result is 'below the acceptable threshold of 0.1 EU/mL' but measured value is '< 0.20 EU/mL'. The < 0.20 result does pass a 0.1 threshold, but the phrasing could be clearer (e.g., detection limit vs. specification limit).
Lab verification recommended
BioRegen appears to be a contract testing lab. The validation key and QR code are provided for verification, but independent confirmation via [email protected] or www.bioregen.com is recommended to ensure authenticity.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.