Public COA audit
MOTS-c
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 83%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- YC20250807
- Issue date
- 2025-09-19
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
< 0.20 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Endotoxin testing present
Document is a specialized endotoxin testing report using Pierce Chromogenic LAL assay with proper controls and reagent documentation
Limited scope - endotoxin only
This is a single-panel report (endotoxin testing only). No identity, purity, heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or solvent testing included. This is common for supplemental testing but not a complete COA
Test date within acceptable range
Test date 2025-09-19 is before today (2026-07-28) and appears legitimate
Lab verification needed
BioRegen lab name and contact provided with QR code for verification, but independent verification of lab credentials recommended
Batch/lot number present
LOT #: YC20250807 clearly documented
Interpretation text inconsistency
Interpretation states result is '< 0.20 EU/mL' but then says this is 'below the acceptable threshold of 0.1 EU/mL' - the measured value (0.20) is actually above 0.1, creating logical inconsistency in the pass statement
Professional presentation
Document includes proper reagent traceability (kit lot numbers, standards), controls (positive/negative), and validation key
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.