Public COA audit

DSIP · Delta sleep-inducing peptide

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
83%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.36%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
B-4349569-P
Identity method
UPLC/MS
Sample date
2026-05-27
Issue date
2026-06-01

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    DSIP confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.36%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity achieved

    99.36% purity by UPLC exceeds specification of >98%, which is normal for research-grade peptides

  • Identity confirmed by UPLC/MS

    Both chromatographic and mass spectrometry data provided with clear peaks at expected m/z values

  • Batch information complete

    Lot number B-4349569-P clearly stated with quantity 9.85mg (close to specified 10mg)

  • Dates are logical and current

    Analysis conducted 2026-05-27, received 2026-06-01 (5 days later for reporting is reasonable)

  • Lab verification uncertain

    Horizon Analytical is stated as USA-based with contact email and verification URL, but independent verification of lab accreditation/existence not possible from document alone

  • Limited testing scope

    Only identity and purity panels present; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing reported

  • Professional presentation

    Clean layout with QR code for validation, chromatograms, mass spectra, and signature from PhD chemist

  • Client name placeholder

    Client Name listed as 'Blank' and Identity URL as 'blankpeptides.com' suggests template or placeholder usage

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.