Public COA audit

DSIP · Delta sleep-inducing peptide

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
93%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.54%

Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), and 1 soft concern. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
APR-1049032-P
Identity method
UPLC/MS (Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectrometry)
Sample date
2026-02-21
Issue date
2026-03-06

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    DSIP confirmed by MS

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.54%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    UPLC purity of 99.54% is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides

  • Identity confirmed by MS

    Mass spectrometry shows expected molecular ion peaks consistent with DSIP (C35H48N10O15, MW ~848.8 g/mol)

  • Clear lot identification

    Lot number APR-1049032-P clearly stated with -P suffix indicating purity/identity scope

  • Recent analysis with appropriate timeline

    Received 2026-02-21, analyzed 2026-03-06 - reasonable turnaround time

  • Professional presentation

    Document includes lab contact, analyst signature (Aleksey Yevtodiyenko PhD), and verification QR code

  • Purity/identity report file

    This certificate file looks like a purity/identity report. Many vendors publish a separate endotoxin report for the same lot — missing endotoxin on this file alone does not prove the lot was never tested.

  • Professional formatting with supporting data

    Includes UPLC chromatogram and MS spectrum supporting the reported results

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.