Public COA audit

DSIP

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
88%
Panels
1/7

Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (1/7), 2 soft concerns, and notable note: "Endotoxin panel present". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
B-4349569-E
Sample date
2026-05-27
Issue date
2026-06-01

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Purity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    <0.05 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Endotoxin panel present

    This is an endotoxin-specific report (lot suffix -E). Endotoxin result <0.05 EU/mL is clearly stated and passes typical research-grade specifications.

  • Limited scope report

    This COA is explicitly an endotoxin test report only. No purity, identity, heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent panels are present on this document. The lot suffix '-E' suggests this is a split report; a separate purity/identity report may exist for the base lot B-4349569.

  • Lot number present

    Lot B-4349569-E is clearly stated. The '-E' suffix is consistent with an endotoxin-specific report.

  • Dates present and valid

    Analysis conducted 2026-05-27, received 2026-06-01. Both dates are on or before the current date (2026-09-05) and are logically ordered.

  • Lab verification needed

    Horizon Analytical is stated as the testing lab with contact email and verification URL (horizonanalytical.com). A QR code is present for validation. Independent verification of the lab's existence and this specific report is recommended.

  • Professional presentation

    Document has clean formatting, logo, signature block (Aleksey Yevtodiyenko PhD), and QR validation code. Appearance is consistent with a legitimate analytical lab report.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.