Public COA audit

GLOW · GHK-Cu

Audited July 29, 2026

Consistent with a legitimate COA

Document structure and test panels align with what we expect from authentic lab reports.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
93%
Panels
5/7
Purity (printed)
99.95%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
PS-20260601-GL01
Identity method
HPLC-RTM
Sample date
2026-06-26
Issue date
2026-07-07

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

5 of 7 present · 4 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 2 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    GHK-Cu + BPC-157 + TB-4 Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.95%

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    As: 0.1483 ppm, Cd: ND, Pb: 0.0523 ppm, Hg: ND, Cr: 0.4314 ppm, Fentanyl: ND

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · result on file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    0.174 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Tested · passed

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No Growth

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed with triplicate testing

    99.95% purity (Conformity V2) with mean 99.89% across three samples (Std Dev 0.0455%). This is normal for research-grade peptides and supported by chromatogram.

  • Multi-component blend identity confirmed

    HPLC-RTM confirmed presence of all three stated peptides (GHK-Cu, BPC-157, TB-4) with individual content quantification.

  • Comprehensive testing panel

    Includes purity, identity, heavy metals (5 elements + fentanyl screen), sterility (PCR), and endotoxin. Missing only microbial culture and residual solvents/water.

  • Clear batch identification

    Lot PS-20260601-GL01, Accession ACC-2026-6581, COA COA-2026-953367 with QR verification code QJ638L5L.

  • Logical date sequence

    Received 2026-06-26, analyzed 2026-07-07, issued 2026-07-07. All dates are consistent and on or before today (2026-07-29).

  • ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab

    ILS Laboratories, San Diego, CA. Claims ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation. Verification URL and access code provided.

  • Professional presentation

    Well-structured two-page report with detailed methodology notes, chromatogram, conformity testing table, and proper signatures.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.