Public COA audit
Tesamorelin
Audited September 5, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 1/7
Scored poorly because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (1/7), 3 critical findings, and notable note: "Heavy metals only - no identity or purity testing". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- TS20250722
- Issue date
- 2025-11-12
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this certificate file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Purity
Not on this certificate file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
All ICH Q3D metals tested below limits except Silver (0.263 µg) and Barium (0.382 µg) detected
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Heavy metals only - no identity or purity testing
This COA contains ONLY heavy metals testing (EPA 208/245 methods for ICH Q3D elemental impurities). No identity confirmation (MS, NMR, HPLC retention time), no purity/HPLC analysis, no endotoxin, no microbial testing. This is a partial/supplemental report, not a complete COA for peptide quality verification.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, NMR, amino acid analysis, or other identity verification method present. Cannot confirm the sample is actually Tesamorelin.
No purity analysis
No HPLC, no purity percentage reported. Essential for peptide quality assessment.
No sample receipt or analysis date
Only publication date (2025-11-12) is shown. No sample receipt date or testing completion date documented.
Lab appears legitimate
TrustPointe Analytics LLC is a real laboratory in Dorr, MI with verifiable contact information and LIMS verification system.
Professional formatting with signatures
Document has proper structure, QR code verification, dual signatures (Ashlee Lust, President; Joshua Lust, Managing Director), and detailed heavy metals panel.
Client SID and lab sample ID present
Client SID: TS20250722, Lab Sample ID: SPL-2072-R01
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.