Public COA audit
CJC-1295 no DAC
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.2%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CNMZO626
- Identity method
- FTIR
- Sample date
- 2026-07-10
- Issue date
- 2026-07-14
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
FTIR sample spectrum confirms the presence of CJC-1295 no DAC with addition of excipients/fillers
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.2 mg (172.3 %)
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High HPLC purity
99.2% purity is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides. HPLC potency result of 172.3% indicates higher actual content than labeled (10 mg labeled, 17.2 mg actual).
FTIR and HPLC identity confirmation
Identity confirmed via FTIR spectroscopy and HPLC analysis using USP methods. FTIR notes presence of excipients/fillers, which is normal.
Complete batch information
Lot number CNMZO626, BT Sample ID 005000040866339, labeled peptide CJC-1295 no DAC, 10 mg content.
Recent testing dates
Sample tested 2026-07-10, report issued 2026-07-14. Both dates are current and consistent with today's date (2026-07-28).
Established testing laboratory
BTLabs (West Palm Beach, FL) with contact information, website, and dual scientist signatures (Andrew Castro, AS and Escander Paredes, AS).
Limited testing scope
COA only includes identity and purity testing. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing. The disclaimer explicitly states it does not provide information on microbial contamination or endotoxins.
Professional presentation
Well-structured report with QR code, report ID (IF-824-QSA-TR006-BTL269652-09), clear methodology references (USP standards), and appropriate disclaimers.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.