Public COA audit

CJC-IPA · CJC-1295

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
88%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
98.8%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
nneyc52
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2026-05-28
Issue date
2026-06-05

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    98.8%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High chromatographic purity

    98.8% purity is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides

  • Mass spectral confirmation

    Both CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin confirmed by HPLC-UV-MS with mass spectral match

  • CAS numbers provided

    CJC-1295: 863288-34-0, Ipamorelin: 170851-70-4

  • Label claim percentages

    CJC-1295 at 84.6% and Ipamorelin at 85.1% of label claim (10 mg total)

  • Batch/lot number present

    nneyc52

  • Dates within expected range

    Sample received 2026-05-28, report issued 2026-06-05 (8-day turnaround)

  • Lab identification

    Krause Analytical LLC, Austin TX, with director signature (Mark C. Krause)

  • Verification URL provided

    https://finnrick.com/verify with certificate ID nneyc52

  • Limited testing panels

    Only identity and purity panels shown; endotoxin and metals methods described on page 4 but no results provided

  • Professional presentation

    Includes chromatogram (page 2), mass spectrum (page 3), and methods summary (page 4)

  • Watermark overlay

    Large 'FINNRICK' watermark across all pages may indicate sample/demo document, though this is common for vendor-distributed COAs

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.