Public COA audit
CJC-1295 · CJC-1295 (mod GRF 1-29)
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 68
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.196%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Identity method
- DAC analysis
- Sample date
- 2026-02-18
- Issue date
- 2026-02-27
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
CJC-1295 (mod GRF 1-29) 2.16 mg
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.196%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity result
99.196% purity is within normal range for research peptides
Identity confirmed
CJC-1295 (mod GRF 1-29) identified via DAC analysis with quantification (2.16 mg)
Missing batch/lot number
Batch field is blank; no lot number provided for traceability
Dates are consistent
Testing ordered 08 FEB 2026, sample received 18 FEB 2026, analysis conducted 27 FEB 2026 - logical sequence
Known testing laboratory
Janoshik Analytical is a recognized third-party peptide testing lab
Verification system present
Provides verification URL (www.janoshik.com/verify/) and unique key (8T5N48QLEMAF)
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity tested; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or solvent/water content panels
Client name redacted
Client field appears to be redacted/obscured, which is unusual for a standard COA
Manufacturer unknown
Manufacturer field explicitly states 'Unknown', reducing traceability
DAC not detected
CJC-1295 DAC analysis shows 'not detected', while modified GRF 1-29 variant detected - suggests this is the non-DAC version
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.