Public COA audit
GHK-Cu · GHK Copper
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.73%
Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), and 1 soft concern. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CU20250717
- Identity method
- Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectrometry (UHPLC-MS)
- Sample date
- 2025-07-29
- Issue date
- 2025-08-09
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
GHK Copper
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.73%
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
99.73% purity by LC-MS with clear chromatogram showing single dominant peak at retention time ~0.35 min
Identity confirmed by mass spectrometry
Full scan MS shows expected molecular ion at m/z 341.1923 (z=1) matching GHK-Cu formula C14H23CuN6O4
Batch number present
CU20250717
Sample and analysis dates present
Sample received 2025-07-29, analysis conducted 2025-08-09 (11-day turnaround)
Testing lab identified
BioRegen with analyst Dr. Roberto Marin, [email protected], verification URL provided
Limited testing scope
This COA covers identity and purity only. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing shown on this report
Professional presentation
Clean layout with BioRegen branding, QR code for verification, calibration curve, and signature present
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (392 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.