Public COA audit

BPC-157 · Thymosin Beta-4

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
88
Confidence
92%
Panels
3/7
Purity (printed)
99.93%

Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (3/7), and 1 soft concern. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
0008
Identity method
HPLC with UV Detection Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (LCMS/MS)
Sample date
2025-11-19
Issue date
2025-11-21

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

3 of 7 present · 3 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 4 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    BPC-157/Thymosin Beta-4 confirmed by mass spectrometry with m/z peaks at 710.23 [M+2H]2+, 993.43 [M+5H]5+, 828.03 [M+6H]6+, 1241.28 [M+4H]4+

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.93%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    ≤ 0.05 EU/mL (both replicates)

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    99.93% purity by HPLC is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides

  • Mass spectrometry confirmation

    Multiple charge states detected for both BPC-157 and TB-4, with chromatogram showing two distinct peaks consistent with a blend product

  • Lot number present

    Lot 0008 clearly stated

  • Dates within normal range

    Received 2025-11-19, reported 2025-11-21 (2-day turnaround is reasonable)

  • Lab identification

    Freedom Diagnostics with verification URL and contact email provided. Signed by Stephen Schmidt, Principal Chemist

  • Split report structure

    This is a two-page split report: Page 1 covers purity/identity (accession 2511190037), Page 2 covers endotoxin testing (accession 2511190038). Both pages reference the same lot 0008. This split-report format is common practice.

  • Limited testing scope

    Heavy metals, microbial contamination, sterility, and residual solvents/water content not tested. This is common for basic research peptide COAs but limits comprehensive quality assurance.

  • Professional presentation

    Document includes chromatogram, mass spectrum, product photos, appropriate disclaimers, and searchable verification system

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.