Public COA audit
BPC-157
Audited July 28, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 0/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- N260710-001
- Issue date
- 2026-07-17
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
0 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 7 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Only assay test present
COA contains only a single HPLC assay test (10.7 mg vs 10 mg specification). No identity confirmation (MS, NMR), no purity analysis (HPLC %), no safety panels (heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin). This is insufficient for peptide quality verification.
No purity data
Document shows only mass/assay result (10.7 mg), not purity percentage. Standard peptide COAs require HPLC purity analysis showing percentage purity.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, NMR, or other identity confirmation method present. Cannot verify the compound is actually BPC-157.
Lab verification unclear
Qalitex Inc. claims ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accreditation (AGS-US050824-1) but no verification URL or QR code destination provided. Accreditation body 'AGS' format is non-standard for US labs (typically A2LA, ANAB, PJLA).
No sample/test dates
Issue date present (2026-07-17) but no sample receipt date or testing date range provided. Cannot verify testing timeline.
Batch identifiers present
Batch number N260710-001 and lot number SP26-BPV10 clearly stated.
Minimal content for 2-page document
Page 2 is essentially blank except for header/footer. Unusual for a legitimate multi-page COA which typically includes chromatograms, detailed methods, or additional test results.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.