Public COA audit
Wolverine · BPC-157
Audited September 5, 2026
Document structure and test panels align with what we expect from authentic lab reports.
- Legitimacy
- 95
- Confidence
- 92%
- Panels
- 5/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.84%
Scored high because document structure and panels look consistent with authentic lab output and broad panel coverage (5/7).
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CR-BPTB20-2605-1
- Identity method
- HPLC-RTM (retention time matching)
- Sample date
- 2026-05-22
- Issue date
- 2026-06-01
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
5 of 7 present · 5 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 2 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
BPC-157 + TB-500 Confirmed
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.84%
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
All Not Detected (As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb)
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
0.567 EU/mL
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
No Growth
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Excellent purity with conformity testing
99.84% purity confirmed across 3 samples (mean 99.83%, std dev 0.0082%), demonstrating batch consistency. High purity is normal for research peptides.
Identity confirmed by HPLC-RTM
Blend components BPC-157 and TB-500 confirmed present by retention time matching. Chromatogram provided.
Clear lot identification
Lot CR-BPTB20-2605-1, COA COA-2026-XFMMPN, Accession ACC-2026-3096
Dates are consistent and valid
Received 2026-05-22, analyzed and issued 2026-06-01. All dates are on or before 2026-09-05.
ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab
ILS Laboratories, San Diego, CA. ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation noted. Verification URL and QR code provided.
Comprehensive testing panel
Includes purity (HPLC), identity (HPLC-RTM), heavy metals (ICP-MS), sterility (PCR), endotoxin (USP <85>), and fentanyl screen. Microbial culture and residual solvents not included.
Fentanyl screening included
Immunoassay screen for fentanyl (50 ng/mL cutoff) - Not Detected, PASS
Professional presentation
Well-formatted 2-page report with clear tables, chromatogram, methodology notes, and lab director signature
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.