Public COA audit
BPC-157 · TB-500
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 5/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.86%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CR-BPCTB20-2606-GREEN
- Identity method
- HPLC-RTM (chromatographic retention time comparison with reference standard)
- Sample date
- 2026-06-23
- Issue date
- 2026-07-02
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
5 of 7 present · 5 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 2 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
BPC-157 + TB-500/TB-4 Confirmed
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.86%
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
As 0.322 ppm, Cd 0.132 ppm, Pb 0.498 ppm, Hg 0.546 ppm, Cr 0.875 ppm
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
0.083 EU/mL
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
No Growth
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
99.86% purity by HPLC with conformity testing across 3 samples (mean 99.84%, std dev 0.0141%) demonstrates excellent batch consistency
Identity confirmed
Both BPC-157 and TB-500/TB-4 confirmed present by HPLC retention time match with reference standards
Batch information complete
Lot number CR-BPCTB20-2606-GREEN, COA #COA-2026-SVFYQU, Accession #ACC-2026-6245 all clearly documented
Dates consistent
Sample received 2026-06-23, analyzed and issued 2026-07-02 (9-day turnaround is reasonable)
Lab credentials present
ILS Laboratories claims ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation, provides physical address (8222 Vickers St, Suite 106, San Diego, CA 92111), phone (619) 329-3999, and verification URL
Comprehensive testing
Includes identity, purity, heavy metals, sterility (PCR), endotoxin, fentanyl screen, and conformity testing across multiple samples. Missing only microbial count and residual solvents/water content
Additional safety testing
Fentanyl immunoassay screen included (not detected at 50 ng/mL cutoff), which is a positive safety measure
Professional presentation
Well-formatted with clear tables, HPLC chromatogram, QR code for verification, detailed methodology notes, and lab director signature
Lab verification recommended
While the COA appears legitimate, independent verification of ILS Laboratories' accreditation status and the provided verification URL (portal.ils-lab.com/verify/LTyYdBnO_V6KBCqa) is recommended
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.