Public COA audit
Wolverine · BPC-157
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 5/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.9%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CR-BPTB20-2605-1
- Identity method
- HPLC-RTM (retention time matching)
- Sample date
- 2026-05-27
- Issue date
- 2026-06-01
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
5 of 7 present · 4 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 2 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
Confirmed (BPC-157 + TB-500)
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.90%
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
All Not Detected (As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb)
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · result on file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
NMT 0.05 EU/mL
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
No Growth
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
99.90% purity by HPLC with conformity testing across two samples (mean 99.88%, std dev 0.025%). This is normal for research-grade peptides.
Identity confirmed
HPLC-RTM confirmed presence of both BPC-157 and TB-500 components. Chromatogram provided with two major peaks consistent with blend composition.
Comprehensive testing panel
Full QC panel includes purity, identity, heavy metals, sterility, endotoxin, and fentanyl screening. Five of seven standard panel types present.
Batch information complete
Lot number CR-BPTB20-2605-1, accession ACC-2026-3296, with conformity testing on two samples from the batch.
Dates consistent and valid
Sample received 2026-05-27, analyzed 2026-06-01, issued 2026-06-01. All dates are on or before 2026-07-28 and show logical sequence.
Lab credentials stated
ILS Laboratories claims ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation. Address, phone, and verification URL provided. Lab director signature present.
Lab verification not independently confirmed
Cannot verify ILS Laboratories' ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation status or domain ownership without external lookup. Verification URL and QR code provided but not tested.
Professional presentation
Multi-page COA with consistent branding, detailed methodology notes, chromatogram, and conformity testing data. Format is consistent with legitimate analytical lab reports.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.