Public COA audit
Wolverine Blend · BPC-157
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 4/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.9%
Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (4/7), and 2 soft concerns. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- BPCTB20-0616
- Identity method
- MALDI-MS
- Sample date
- 2026-06-19
- Issue date
- 2026-06-25
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
4 of 7 present · 4 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 3 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
BPC-157, TB-500
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.9%
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
<0.01 ppm
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
<0.05 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
99.9% purity by RP-HPLC is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides
Dual peptide blend confirmed
MALDI-MS confirms presence of both BPC-157 and TB-500 components with expected molecular weights
Core safety panels present
Endotoxin and heavy metals testing completed and passed
Professional presentation
Document includes HPLC chromatogram, mass spectrum, product photo, QR code, and verification URL
Reasonable timeline
6-day turnaround from sample receipt (June 19) to COA issue (June 25, 2026)
Minor typo in URL
Verification URL shows 'bioviridians.com' (plural) while header shows 'BIOVIRIDIAN' (singular) - likely minor branding inconsistency
Missing optional panels
Microbial, sterility, and residual solvent/water testing not performed - common for research-grade materials but worth noting
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.