Public COA audit

BPC-157

Audited September 5, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
45
Confidence
75%
Panels
1/7

Scored poorly because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (1/7), 3 critical findings, and notable note: "Endotoxin-only report". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
APR-9216929
Sample date
2026-03-20
Issue date
2026-03-27

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Purity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    <0.05 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Endotoxin-only report

    This COA only contains endotoxin testing results. No identity confirmation (MS, NMR), purity (HPLC), heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent/water panels are present on this document. This appears to be a split/supplemental report focused solely on endotoxin testing.

  • Endotoxin test present and passing

    Endotoxin result of <0.05 EU/mL is well within acceptable limits for research peptides and indicates low bacterial endotoxin contamination.

  • Lot number clearly stated

    Lot APR-9216929 is clearly printed and matches the compound identifier.

  • Dates are reasonable

    Received date 2026-03-20 and analysis conducted date 2026-03-27 are both on or before the current date (2026-09-05) and show a logical 7-day turnaround.

  • Lab verification needed

    Horizon Analytical is listed with contact email and website horizonanalytical.com. Independent verification of this lab's existence, accreditation, and whether they issued this specific report is recommended.

  • Limited scope document

    This appears to be a supplemental or split COA covering only endotoxin testing. A complete COA for research peptides typically includes identity, purity, and multiple safety panels. The client may have received separate reports for other testing.

  • No purity data

    No HPLC, TLC, or other purity analysis is present on this document. Purity is a critical quality parameter for research peptides.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, NMR, or other identity confirmation method is documented. Identity verification is essential to confirm the compound is actually BPC-157.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.