Public COA audit

BPC-157

Audited July 28, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
45
Confidence
75%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
665394
Identity method
LCMS/MS
Sample date
2026-04-06
Issue date
2026-04-07

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    Pass (Replicate 1 and 2)

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • No purity data reported

    Document claims LCMS/MS purity analysis was conducted but provides no numerical purity value, chromatogram, or quantitative results

  • No identity confirmation data

    No mass spectrum, retention time, or molecular weight confirmation provided despite claiming LCMS/MS analysis

  • Only endotoxin testing shown

    COA only presents endotoxin pass/fail results; lacks the core analytical data (purity percentage, identity confirmation) typically expected on a peptide COA

  • Minimal analytical detail

    Document structure is sparse with no chromatograms, spectra, or quantitative measurements beyond endotoxin pass/fail

  • Limited lab verification information

    Website URL provided but no physical address, accreditation details, or analyst credentials beyond a signature

  • Dates are valid and sequential

    Received 2026-04-06, reported 2026-04-07 - both dates are before today (2026-07-28) and show appropriate turnaround

  • Batch/lot number present

    Lot 665394 clearly stated

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.