Public COA audit

BPC-157

Audited July 28, 2026

Consistent with a legitimate COA

Document structure and test panels align with what we expect from authentic lab reports.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
93%
Panels
5/7
Purity (printed)
99.86%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
CR-BPC10-2606-BLUE
Identity method
HPLC-RTM
Sample date
2026-06-23
Issue date
2026-07-02

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

5 of 7 present · 5 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 2 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.86%

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    As: 0.432 ppm, Cd: 0.097 ppm, Pb: 0.398 ppm, Hg: 0.331 ppm, Cr: 0.650 ppm

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    0.079 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Tested · passed

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No Growth

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity with conformity testing

    99.86% purity confirmed across 3 samples (mean 99.84%, std dev 0.0125%), with detailed HPLC chromatogram provided. This is normal for research-grade peptides.

  • Identity confirmed by HPLC-RTM

    BPC-157 identity confirmed by chromatographic retention time comparison with reference standard.

  • Clear batch identification

    Lot number CR-BPC10-2606-BLUE clearly stated with COA number COA-2026-WZYGUU and accession number ACC-2026-6187.

  • Dates are consistent and current

    Sample received 2026-06-23, analyzed and issued 2026-07-02. All dates are consistent and within normal timeframes.

  • ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab

    ILS Laboratories claims ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation with full contact details (8222 Vickers St, Suite 106, San Diego, CA 92111). Verification URL and QR code provided.

  • Comprehensive testing suite

    Includes purity/quantitation (HPLC), identity, heavy metals (ICP-MS), sterility (PCR), endotoxin (USP <85>), and fentanyl screening. Missing only microbial count and residual solvents, which is acceptable.

  • Fentanyl screening included

    Immunoassay fentanyl screen (50 ng/mL cutoff) shows 'Not Detected' - an additional safety measure increasingly common in peptide testing.

  • Professional presentation

    Well-formatted 2-page COA with clear tables, chromatogram, methodology notes, lab director signature, and verification codes. Consistent branding and layout.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.