Public COA audit

BPC-157

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
88%
Panels
5/7
Purity (printed)
99.86%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
CRBPC-10-2605-1
Identity method
HPLC-RTM
Sample date
2026-05-27
Issue date
2026-06-01

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

5 of 7 present · 4 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 2 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.86%

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    All Not Detected (As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb)

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · result on file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    NMT 0.05 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Tested · passed

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No Growth

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    99.86% purity by HPLC with conformity testing across 3 samples (mean 99.85%, std dev 0.0125%) demonstrates excellent batch consistency

  • Identity confirmed

    BPC-157 confirmed by HPLC retention time matching reference standard

  • Comprehensive testing panel

    Full QC panel includes purity, identity, heavy metals, sterility, endotoxin, and fentanyl screening

  • Batch information complete

    Lot number CRBPC-10-2605-1, COA number COA-2026-RAVNVG, Accession ACC-2026-3358

  • Dates consistent

    Sample received 2026-05-27, analyzed 2026-06-01, issued 2026-06-01 - all dates are logical and on or before 2026-07-28

  • ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab

    ILS Laboratories claims ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation with complete contact information and verification system

  • Lab verification not independently confirmed

    Cannot independently verify ILS Laboratories accreditation status or the specific verification URL without external access

  • Professional presentation

    Multi-page COA with detailed methodology notes, chromatogram, conformity testing data, and proper signatures

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.